Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mia Ristic vs Mana Kawamura Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ristic vs Kawamura analysis and find out who is favored!
Mia Ristic vs Mana Kawamura Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ristic 1 - 0 Kawamura
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ristic has won 47.52% of points on their second serve, while Kawamura has won 43.11%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ristic, in recent form, has won 54.34% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kawamura has won 56.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.22% and 43.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ristic has saved 51.4% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kawamura has saved 48.4% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ristic has won 58.18% of matches played (W/L 32/ 23), with Kawamura winning 60.94% (W/L 39/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ristic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5). Kawamura has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Ristic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.7% of matches (W/L 27/ 19), where as Kawamura has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.67% of matches (W/L 37/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ristic winning 1 times and Kawamura being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ristic winning 2 and Kawamura winning 0. The last match between Ristic and Kawamura was at the W25 Kursumlijska Banja, 28-06-2023, First, Clay with Mia Ristic getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ristic and Kawamura have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ristic winning 0 times and Kawamura 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ristic winning 0, and Kawamura 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ristic has played against opponents with an average rank of 287.22 while Kawamura has played against players with an average rank of 182.95.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ristic has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kawamura has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ristic has converted 49.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kawamura has converted 52.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
322
Rank
307
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
618
Rank
537
High
22
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
61% (66-42)
Career Total W/L
59% (117-83)
44% (8-10)
YTD W/L
59% (19-13)
$2,438
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Mia Ristic vs Mana Kawamura For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Ristic VS Kawamura
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Mia Ristic | Mana Kawamura |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:0 | 1:34:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (46/68) | 74% (34/46) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (30/46) | 50% (17/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (12/22) | 33% (4/12) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 13% (1/8) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (25/46) | 38% (26/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Mia Ristic
Player
Mana Kawamura
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
1
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mia Ristic | Mana Kawamura |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (8/10) | 59% (19/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (18/23) | 62% (43/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (182/192) | 58% (326/239) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 59% (13/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) | 60% (6/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 21 | 29 |
| DFs per game | 0.07 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 13 | 54 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:28 | 1:11:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 272.5 | 140.03 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (575/878) | 67% (981/1467) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (337/575) | 59% (583/981) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (144/303) | 43% (210/486) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (47/95) | 53% (109/207) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (370/851) | 49% (716/1447) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (5/8) | 61% (19/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (8/18) | 59% (19/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 90% (21/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 10% (21/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 0% (11/0) |
Mia Ristic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ksenia Laskutova
Player
Mia Ristic
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mia Ristic
Player
Pemra Ozgen
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
76%
(
67 of
88)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mia Ristic
Player
Yaroslava Bartashevich
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ziva Falkner
Player
Mia Ristic
83%
(
57 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jenny Duerst
Player
Mia Ristic
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
48
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Mia Ristic
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mia Ristic
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mia Ristic
Player
Claudia Ferrer Perez
44%
(
15 of
34)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruth Roura Llaverias
Player
Mia Ristic
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
0
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Mia Ristic
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
9
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Mana Kawamura Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mana Kawamura
Player
Olga Golas
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Mana Kawamura
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
48%
(
32 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mana Kawamura
Player
Lidia Encheva
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
10
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
37 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
44 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Mana Kawamura
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
44%
(
20 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
82%
(
27 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
6-0 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Mana Kawamura
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
51%
(
25 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(1) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mana Kawamura
Player
Denise Valente
71%
(
67 of
94)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
48%
(
45 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Linda Klimovicova
Player
Mana Kawamura
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
71%
(
75 of
106)
5
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
3
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
32%
(
12 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
43 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mana Kawamura
Player
Anastasia Kulikova
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Ristic Vs Kawamura Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Ristic are available here and Kawamura photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
